The IHRA working definition was developed 2016. The Center for Constitutional Rights and Palestine Legal also sent a supplemental letter providing multiple examples of how the definition is used to censor Palestine advocates. “With that in mind, we are concerned that the reference to the IHRA definition in the ABA resolution would undermine the ABA’s own ability to engage on key issues related to Palestinian rights, including in support of human rights defenders who are increasingly under attack.” “Just as we believe the ABA should be involved in fighting antisemitism, we believe the ABA –consistent with its commitment to the rule of law, the legal process, holding governments accountable under law, human rights, and justice – has an important role to play in conveying concerns about Israel and its policies,” it reads. More than 40 organizations (including the ACLU, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Palestine Legal) sent a letter to the resolution’s cosponsors detailing their concerns about the definition. government, “to condemn antisemitism based on the IHRA’s definition, but the body faced pressure from human rights groups over its inclusion. The original version of Resolution 514, which was approved by the ABA House of Delegates at its midyear meeting in New Orleans, called on the U.S. Critics of the definition have long warned that it can be implemented as a tool to stifle Palestinian activism and speech. Individuals should consult an authorized legal professional before following any of the information provided.This week the American Bar Association (ABA) passed a resolution condemning antisemitism after it removed a reference to International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) controversial working definition. Please note that this article is for informational purposes only.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |